New England Peer Review Logo Contact Us
Home Firms Reviewers About NEPR Feedback Form Newsletter Links

Answers

  1. AICPA members active in the practice of public accounting must be associated with a firm that participates in an AICPA practice-monitoring program if the firm performs services within the scope of the peer review standards and issues reports in accordance with AICPA professional standards. The objectives of these programs are to help CPAs improve the services provided and to raise the quality and prestige of the profession. AICPA members in the practice of public accounting with a firm auditing one or more public companies may be associated with that firm only if it is a member of the SEC Practice Section. The firms of other AICPA members may join either the AICPA Peer Review Program or the SEC Practice Section.
  2. A firm should submit an "AICPA Peer Review Programs Enrollment Form" to the AICPA Practice Monitoring team. By enrolling, a firm agrees to comply with the AICPA's quality control standards and to have a peer review of its accounting and auditing practice every three years. A firm seeking to enroll in the peer review program should be in compliance with the Council resolution concerning form of organization (see AICPA Professional Standards, vol. 2 ET Appendix B). In addition, at least one owner of the firm must be an AICPA member in order to enroll in the AICPA Peer Review Program. Download the AICPA Peer Review Program enrollment form or request a form from NEPR. You may view and print this form using Acrobat Reader. If you do not have Acrobat Reader, you can download it from www.adobe.com/prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html
  3. 42,084 firms are enrolled in the AICPA Peer Review Program.
  4. No, the firm is not required to enroll, but it should enroll if it begins performing audit, review, compilation or attestation engagements. The review would generally take place within eighteen months of the fiscal year end of the engagement accepted.
  5. Generally, a firm's first review is due within eighteen months of enrolling. However, a review may be due earlier if the firm was previously enrolled in the program or the SEC Practice Section, or didn't enroll when it was required to.
  6. Yes, firms performing one or more engagements under the SASs, or examinations of prospective financial statements have system peer reviews (reviews commencing 12/31/00 and earlier were called "on-site" reviews). Firms that do not perform any of these engagements may have a less comprehensive engagement or report peer review. These reviews are explained in more detail in the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews on this web site.
  7. The AICPA Peer Review Program is administered in cooperation with the state CPA societies who elect to administer the program. Generally, a state CPA society administers peer reviews of those firms whose main offices are located in that state and in those states, if any, that the society has been asked to administer. Reviews of firms located in New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine and Rhode Island are administered by New England Peer Review, Inc.
  8. A firm may ask another qualified firm, an association of which it is a member, or the state CPA society administering its review to appoint a review team (CART) to perform its system, engagement or report peer review. The firm is free to choose the type of review team that best serves its needs. However, all societies do not offer CART reviews.
  9. Enter your resume at the AICPA reviewer website at: http://peerreview.aicpaservices.org/default.asp
  10. Reviewer requirements—
    • Be an AICPA member in good standing
    • Have a current CPA license
    • Be associated as an owner, employee or as a leased or per diem employee who spends at least 25% of their time in performing audits, reviews, compilations, or other attest engagements with an enrolled firm that, if reviewed, has received an unmodified opinion on its system of quality control for its most recent completed peer review or an unmodified report on its off-site or engagement review.
    • Possess current knowledge of applicable professional standards
    • Be currently active in public practice at a supervisory level in the accounting or auditing function of a firm that is enrolled in the AICPA Peer Review Program or a member of the SEC Practice Section of the AICPA Division for CPA Firms (an "enrolled firm").
    • Achieved the level of either owner or manager or person (including a leased or per diem employee who spends at least 25% of their time in performing audits, reviews, compilations or other attest engagements) with equivalent supervisory responsibilities.
    • Must have at least 5 years of recent experience in the accounting and auditing function of an enrolled firm
    • Must not have his or her ability to practice accounting or auditing limited or restricted in any way by a regulatory, monitoring or enforcement body.
    • Must meet the minimum continuing professional education requirements in subjects relating to accounting and auditing, under Interpretation No. 4 of the Standards

    Additional Requirements for System Review Team Captains—

    • Must be an owner of an enrolled firm that has received an unmodified opinion on its system of quality control for its accounting and auditing practice for its most recently completed peer review. If the individual is associated with more than one firm, then each of the firms the individual is associated with should have received an unmodified report on its most recently completed peer review of its accounting and auditing practice
    • Must have completed an approved reviewer's training course during the 5 year period prior to the commencement of the review

    Additional Requirements for Engagement or Report Reviewers—

    • Must be associated as an owner, employee, or as a leased or per diem employee who spends at least 25% of their time in performing audits, reviews, compilations, or other attest engagements with an enrolled firm that has received, on its most recently completed peer review, either an unmodified opinion on its system of quality control or an unmodified report on its engagement or off-site review. If the individual is associated with more than one firm, then each of the firms the individual is associated with should have received an unmodified report on its most recently completed peer review of its accounting practice.
    • Must have completed an approved reviewer's training course during the 5 year period prior to the commencement of the review

  11. How many reviews has the individual performed?

    How much experience does the reviewer have in the industries in which my firm performs?
     
    Will the reviewer be able to complete the review on time, allowing you enough time to submit the report, letter of comments and letter of response, if any, to the state CPA society by your firm's review due date?

    Ask the reviewer for a list of firms for which he or she has conducted peer reviews. Are there any other value-added services you can provide me during the peer review?
  12. All firms should establish and maintain appropriate quality control policies and procedures and comply with those policies and procedures to ensure the quality of the services they provide to the public. Several publications are available from the AICPA's Order Department, such as the Standards for Performing and Reporting on Peer Reviews, the AICPA Peer Review Program Manual subscription service, and the Guide for Establishing and Maintaining a System of Quality Control for a Firm's Accounting and Auditing Practice. The peer review program standards and quality control standards are available in the AICPA Professional Standards Vol. 2.
  13. The cost of a system review for an average firm will vary between $1,500 to $3,500 depending on the size and nature of the firm's accounting and auditing practice. For example, a firm whose practice is 70% accounting and auditing and 30% tax may pay more than a firm with the opposite mix. Moreover, a firm with audits in various specialized industries may pay more than a firm with the same number of audits that are all in one industry or in non-specialized areas. In addition to the review costs that will be incurred every three years, firms may also pay an annual administrative fee to their administering entity to cover the costs of running the program and/or fees for scheduling and evaluating the results of the review.
  14. When deficiencies are found, the firm is expected to identify and take corrective measures to prevent the same types of deficiencies from happening in the future. Such actions could include making appropriate changes in its quality control system or having its personnel take additional continuing professional education in specified areas. The administering state CPA society may also ask the firm to agree to other actions it deems appropriate. The main objective of a review is to help the firm improve the quality of its practice.
  15. You should discuss the findings and recommendations with the team captain and suggest alternative recommendations for improvement.

  16. The latest peer review report, letter of comment and letter of response for a firm that is a member of PCPS or the SEC Practice Section may be obtained by calling 1-800-CPA-FIRM. Peer review results for firms enrolled in the AICPA Peer Review Program are confidential. However, the reviewed firm is allowed to give you a copy if it chooses to do if asked.
  17. If you have filed form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission you may be eligible to join the AICPA Peer Review Program. However, you should first consult with the SEC Practice Section at 201 / 938-3030.
  18. Enrollment in the peer review program is required as a condition for voluntary membership in the AICPA. However, the peer review program is an important element of self-regulation by the profession and in order to protect the public interest a firm may not resign during the course of its peer review except under certain circumstances. The peer review commences when the reviewer begins the fieldwork on a system peer review or begins review of the engagements on an engagement or report peer review. The review ends with completion of any action deemed necessary by the peer review committee and the firm is notified of the acceptance of the review by the administering entity's report acceptance body.

Home | Of Interest to Firms | Reviewers | About NEPR | Feedback Form | Newsletter | Links

The Web NEPR
© 2008 New England Peer Review, Inc Terms of Use